tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post1932574465020053777..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: Righteous Cliché-BustingDick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-22054074031397642362010-07-16T22:53:18.536+01:002010-07-16T22:53:18.536+01:00Talking about noses,a nice little
spraying on the ...Talking about noses,a nice little<br />spraying on the backs of pompous<br />arseholes should give them<br />something to really whinge about.<br />Retire to a distant corner and try not to go black in the face laughing.<br />Can be obtained at any good joke<br />shop or Amazon<br /><br />Fart Spray 30g<br />£1.50<br />A can of the most foul smelling gas you've ever smelt.<br />Spray It Near Someone! Retire To A Safe Distance!<br /><br /><br />Prat shifterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-68270724120664433642010-07-16T15:40:21.838+01:002010-07-16T15:40:21.838+01:00The righteous either do not understand or choose t...The righteous either do not understand or choose to ignore the meaning of negative liberty.<br /><br />So they come up with specious arguments such as "being free from crime" - which translates into treating everyone as a potential criminal, thereby stamping on civil liberties and "being free from second-hand smoke" which translates into bullying and demonising smokers.<br /><br />Naturally, they have a right to be "free from fat people" and "free from drinkers" too...Longriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15139120804208136012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-6029442720984913982010-07-16T14:25:57.857+01:002010-07-16T14:25:57.857+01:00This "smoke stops at my nose argument" i...This "smoke stops at my nose argument" is not relevant to the ban and no matter how many times you explain it, it doesn't get through. How can the existence of a pub designated as smoking affect the MP? She would not go in it. Her only argument then, is that its existence is cutting down her options. Were smoking banned, it may have existed as a non smoking pub. But it could be argued that the existence of every shop cuts down her drinking options. Do these people just switch off and press an automated reply button their heads. They are not all stupid. Those of you who agree with the MP, can you please explain?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-15001916624114386212010-07-16T12:35:47.230+01:002010-07-16T12:35:47.230+01:00My Chav mate Brazza has a simple
remedy for nanny...My Chav mate Brazza has a simple <br />remedy for nanny noses suffering<br />from nico-fumes,a forcefull, well aimed head butt usually sorts the<br />problem out for a day or two.<br /><br />As for femme nannies ,a sharp smack on the back of the head<br />usually alleviates the problem.<br /><br />Sink estate dwellerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-16528295466825633572010-07-16T09:42:22.635+01:002010-07-16T09:42:22.635+01:00Antismokers love to throw these apparently debate-...Antismokers love to throw these apparently debate-stopping, but actually meaningless, comments into arguments. It's a close cousin of "Smokers talk about their right to smoke. What about my right to clean air?"<br /><br />In this way, a discussion about separate smoking rooms in pubs gets hijacked by an idiotic argument about nonexistent "rights" and leaves the bizarre impression that the antismoker making the comment is simultaneously present everywhere.<br /><br />It's quite a clever tactic, as it's hard to argue coherently when your opponent is talking gibberish. Doesn't stop them being bastards, though.Rick Snoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-83059528651377752902010-07-16T09:26:05.072+01:002010-07-16T09:26:05.072+01:00The key point is the ownership of air in, and righ...The key point is the ownership of air in, and rights of access to private property. Nobody has a right to go in any pub, never did have. If the landlord doesn't like you (e.g. because you're an anti smoker) he has the right to refuse admission. On the point of "protecting workers" tthe landlord has the right to hire only smokers. This last poiint would make the antis spit if they knew about it. It should be aired more thoroughly.<br /><br />George SpellerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-44096316392210416002010-07-16T07:52:51.089+01:002010-07-16T07:52:51.089+01:00Anon, It is not that the sense of smell is the tru...Anon, It is not that the sense of smell is the trump card. The righteous have all senses permanently on hair trigger alert for anything in their surroundings which will allow them to be more aggrieved or smug than they already are.<br />It is their reason to exist.<br /><br />I have also heard 'Your noses rights end where my fist begins...Chucklesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-52684893233656617072010-07-16T06:48:28.009+01:002010-07-16T06:48:28.009+01:00Hangemall has the right response!Hangemall has the right response!JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-79972859070418899692010-07-16T04:27:37.954+01:002010-07-16T04:27:37.954+01:00The other day I was smoking outside my work relat...The other day I was smoking outside my work related vehicle when some dippy woman CHOSE to cross the road and give a loud 'tut' as she passed; at that point I blew smoke at her which is something I usually avoid, stupid bitch.bannedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02406037760273820029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-17749092630713237012010-07-16T04:06:37.697+01:002010-07-16T04:06:37.697+01:00There are five senses. Why is the anti-smoker'...There are five senses. Why is the anti-smoker's sense of smell the trump card?<br /><br />If I don't like hip-hop, because it offends me to hear it; if I don't like fat or ugly people, because it offends me to look at them; if I don't like chlorine added to the water supply, because I don't like the way it tastes, on their logic I have a RIGHT to demand these things and people be removed, because:<br /><br />- A person's right to listen to music ends where my ears begin;<br />- An unattractive person's right to go out in public ends where my eyes begin; and<br />- A person's right to safe and clean water ends where my taste buds begin.<br /><br />Just what makes the anti-smoker's sense of smell so important that it justifies a vitriolic crusade of hatred and apartheid against over 20% of the adult population?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-67348131143420013412010-07-16T02:39:20.947+01:002010-07-16T02:39:20.947+01:00Fuck it. Mixed up my eyes with my ears back there....Fuck it. Mixed up my eyes with my ears back there. You get the picture though.Frank Davishttp://frank-davis.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-80556881650788875212010-07-16T02:36:08.155+01:002010-07-16T02:36:08.155+01:00I came across the "Your right to smoke stops ...I came across the "Your right to smoke stops at my nose" argument from John Aravosis of Americablog about 5 or 6 years ago. That was when I stopped reading Americablog, and started to distance myself from the US left, who'd suddenly begun to look horribly ugly.<br /><br />The same argument would be to say "Your right to play music stops at my ears", as used to ban juke boxes in pubs. Or "Your right to say whatever you like stops at my eyes," to ban conversation. Or "Your right to wear garishly coloured clothes stops at my eyeballs," to ban whatever you happen to be wearing.<br /><br />It's an obscene argument. <br /><br />And there are all these 'rights' which materialise out of nowhere. I've argued for a long time that <i>we have no rights,</i> and nobody ever had any rights, and <i>rights</i> are things that simply don't exist.Frank Davishttp://frank-davis.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-48610933883280345372010-07-16T00:15:23.216+01:002010-07-16T00:15:23.216+01:00"Your right to talk shite ends where my ears ..."Your right to talk shite ends where my ears begin. Fuck off."hangemallnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-46271018502721828522010-07-15T23:24:21.714+01:002010-07-15T23:24:21.714+01:00If all antismokers had flat noses, we'd have m...If all antismokers had flat noses, we'd have more room to smoke.<br /><br />And they wouldn't be able to smell anything so everyone would be happy.<br /><br />Cricket bats would do the job. <br /><br /><br />On the cliches, whatever happened to 'it'll stunt your growth'? I haven't heard that one in a long time.Leg-ironhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-83552800981913774082010-07-15T23:08:22.765+01:002010-07-15T23:08:22.765+01:00To simplify it: Where does one's right to put ...To simplify it: Where does one's right to put his nose end? :)brankachnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-91965892275904893042010-07-15T22:45:49.074+01:002010-07-15T22:45:49.074+01:00Bugs doesn't it. I've seen the right "...Bugs doesn't it. I've seen the right "not to breathe smoke" used in the same way with the debate on CCTV and the DNA database. People quote the right "not to be a victim of crime".<br /><br />No such rights exist. I think you could say in most cases that people have a right <i>to</i> , not a right <i> not to </i>.Buckohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169970711606515445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-50223591094749876612010-07-15T22:25:49.510+01:002010-07-15T22:25:49.510+01:00The nose could be put back an inch or so quite eas...The nose could be put back an inch or so quite easily. :)Smoking Hothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04534745989363293923noreply@blogger.com