tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post4175763773349477514..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: Where Are The Carrots, George?Dick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-31422772505924232772010-03-10T01:21:37.201+00:002010-03-10T01:21:37.201+00:00What would it take to persuade me that Global Warm...What would it take to persuade me that Global Warming is real? Well, some proper empirical evidence instead of dodgy datasets and flaky computer models would be a promising start.Bill Stickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05285528897339442436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-68860894633409743522010-03-09T17:39:58.187+00:002010-03-09T17:39:58.187+00:00Vaclav Klaus a few days ago.<a href="http://www.klaus.cz/clanky/2529" rel="nofollow">Vaclav Klaus a few days ago.</a>Frank Davishttp://frank-davis.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-68474365029291810672010-03-09T13:42:52.125+00:002010-03-09T13:42:52.125+00:00Well the Moonbats of this world have another grim ...Well the Moonbats of this world have another grim reality staring them in the face.<br />The complicite nature of the MSM.<br />It's not really about the environment is it ?<br />It's all about money.<br />Simply because sceptics just do not receive the same level of coverage do they.<br />And who owns the MSM ?<br />Mr Moonbat columns like yours are just propaganda.<br />Maybe your style of writing would be more at home in Pravda.<br />Or even possibly ,"Der Adler".<br />Games up mate.<br />Only the "simple" ,and religeously fervent,believe now.<br />Oh and ufortunately 646 with a totally more sinister asgenda to yours.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-71530441273795639812010-03-09T13:42:29.830+00:002010-03-09T13:42:29.830+00:00Your first sentence is very awkwardly constructed,...Your first sentence is very awkwardly constructed, permitting multiple interpretations - e.g. 'no one who denies'- that would be 'someone who accepts' then?Chucklesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-81530555329145263812010-03-09T12:41:41.715+00:002010-03-09T12:41:41.715+00:00On academic publishing - not really monopolistic a...On academic publishing - not really monopolistic and the entry costs these days are very low. The controls are instead academic - crucially peer review (a double blind peer review doubly and blindly so). This allows an author's work to be excluded from publication considered scientific without the source of the argument against being revealed. However, to launch a scientific journal all I need is an editor, an EAB, some copy and access to the internet.Simon Cookehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12586896340482296341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-5484038400156210992010-03-09T12:11:29.600+00:002010-03-09T12:11:29.600+00:00Alternatively:
There is one question that no one ...Alternatively:<br /><br />There is one question that no one who believes in manmade climate change wants to answer: what would it take to persuade you? In most cases the answer seems to be nothing. No level of evidence can shake the entrenched belief that climate science is all true and is above the discipline of scientific objectivity and should be tirelessly promoted by all state bodies, Quangos, greenies and other fellow travellers by whatever means necessary including compulsory restrictions on the lifestyle of billions.JohnRShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07021101596935644363noreply@blogger.com