tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post8068226758543328474..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: Confiscating Children ... For The ChildrenDick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-40148074972601774572013-07-06T06:24:23.771+01:002013-07-06T06:24:23.771+01:00My comment of yesterday seems to have sunk without...My comment of yesterday seems to have sunk without a trace, DP. Was it swallowed by the bottomless chasm of the spambox?nisakimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-50308862366927069432013-07-06T04:40:47.888+01:002013-07-06T04:40:47.888+01:00The NSMA title is a good example of lying. This is...The NSMA title is a good example of lying. This is not a nonsmokers group. It is an antismokers group.<br /><br /> If we consider the Godber Blueprint, there are numerous instances where the antismokers refer to their own activity as “antismoking” – and rightly so. But then they also append this bilge:<br /><br /><i>The term "antismoking," a label often applied by the tobacco industry, should be avoided and positive names such as "national health campaign"<br />used.</i> 1992 (p.17)<br /><br /> According to the antismokers, “antismoking” is a negative label due to another tobacco industry “conspiracy”. Well, we now have the advantage of hindsight. As we consider the last 30 years, the label of “antismoking” is no tobacco industry “conspiracy”. Antismokers are indeed anti-smoke/smoking/smokers, and rabidly…. hysterically….. so. No amount of masquerading their dysfunctional activity with titles such as “health advocate” changes the fact that antismokers are antismokers and are neurotic bigots.What the....noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-78465916787119396962013-07-06T04:15:36.197+01:002013-07-06T04:15:36.197+01:00DP, we’re getting into strong-derangement land. An...DP, we’re getting into strong-derangement land. And it’s not<br />new:<br /><br /><i>“In 1904, for example, a New York judge ordered a woman to jail for 30 days for smoking in front of her children.”</i><br />http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19981129&slug=2786034<br /><br /> From this <i>Non Smokers’ Movement of Australia</i> newsletter:<br /><br /><b>“Declare smoking in the presence of children as physical and emotional child abuse.”</b><br />http://www.nsma.org.au/update06/update54.htm<br /><br /> Given America’s antismoking history over the last 150 years involving Temperance and Eugenics Movements, the claims by antismokers become progressively more absurd and hysterical, and their demands more draconian and inhumane.<br /><br /> There is plenty of evidence that the antismoking mentality is highly dysfunctional. There is constant lying to rationalize an incoherent fear and hatred of tobacco smoke (capnophobics/misocapnists). When these<br />neurotic bigots are let loose on society with the blessing and funding of the<br />State - as was seen early last century, it is they who are the abusers of the<br />public and particularly The Children™ whom they insist on “educating”.<br /><br /> While you’re at the NSMA website, have a look at their archived newsletters for a greater insight into the madness that is antismoking.What the....noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-28374163747303028482013-07-05T22:40:16.645+01:002013-07-05T22:40:16.645+01:00Indeed. But see how they try to make excuses when ...Indeed. But see how they try to make excuses when they realise they are exactly the Nazis they pretend not to be ;) https://twitter.com/Dick_Puddlecote/status/349798006431809536Dick_Puddlecotenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-15975959045778583342013-07-05T21:03:41.820+01:002013-07-05T21:03:41.820+01:00It really is breathtaking how evil some of the Do-...It really is breathtaking how evil some of the Do-Gooders are. THEY 'think' that some sort of behaviour is 'bad' so they consider that THEY have the 'right' to destroy an otherwise very happy family.<br />'Health Nazis' describes THEM perfectly.Steve Brownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-80364939426557916922013-07-05T18:20:11.858+01:002013-07-05T18:20:11.858+01:00Leijonhufvud pointed out that every fifth child in...<i>Leijonhufvud pointed out that every fifth child in Sweden lives with one or two parents who suffer from drinking problems...</i><br /><br />Which means that they drink maybe three glasses of wine / beer during the course of an evening. <br /><br />And as for the grotesque ruling from Sheriff Scott Pattison, the epithet 'health Nazi' doesn't even begin to describe the misanthropic twat. I keep saying this, but <b>who the fuck do they think they are</b>? <br /><br />People like Pattison should be locked away where they can't cause any more damage. A cell on Christmas Island should be far enough away from sane people to contain his madcap ideas. We could send him some companions so he doesn't get lonely. Glantz and Chapman spring to mind, but there are quite a few others who it would benefit the world to send there to keep him company.nisakimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-69143649072189176432013-07-05T17:06:54.685+01:002013-07-05T17:06:54.685+01:00Well, recruiting the kids for a Heath Jugend will...Well, recruiting the kids for a Heath Jugend will ensure that there is always a grass roots support for the Health Polizei.......Crossbownoreply@blogger.com