tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post8441098118589287224..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: E-Cigs: The New Bad Boy In TownDick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-22806771988488926872012-08-01T07:03:04.589+01:002012-08-01T07:03:04.589+01:00In Your blog fact that vaping is enjoyable is prec...In Your blog fact that vaping is enjoyable is precisely the reason those opposed to tobacco are also opposed to less harmful <a href="http://which-electronic-cigarette.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">which electronic cigarette</a>. Can you give us anti-tobacco it's a deep distrust of free trade. Rogeralex53noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-70713843871395818822012-06-15T05:05:23.045+01:002012-06-15T05:05:23.045+01:00 It seems "Dickass", or whatever the sys... It seems "Dickass", or whatever the system here calls it's self will not allow replys to SOME replys, so;<br /><br />XX Yes, people did comply. If they didn't they would have had to face a disciplinary and ultimately get the sack. XX<br /><br />So why have you not answered MY question; "What would they actualy DO if twenty or thirty people lit up in the <br />canteen, or in the office one morning? Call the police to have them <br />removed? MAYBE once, but EVERY morning for ten, twenty, thirty weeks?"<br /><br />See, this is one of the reasons why I fucking HATE Britain. You let all your freedoms get fucked all over, "because we might get sacked", at the same time as saying WE, in Germany should have risked a trip to Poland, just to tell Hitler he was "a naughty boy, and really should not be doing that."<br /><br />You don't fight, you don't deserve to survive. You don't fight for your rights, don't expect them to survive either.<br /><br />Basically; TOUGH, you did fuck all, now live with the consequences, and stop fucking moaning abouit your "plight", on the internet.Furor Teutonicusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-50292204426724100122012-06-14T20:07:00.926+01:002012-06-14T20:07:00.926+01:00Yes, people did comply. If they didn't they wo...Yes, people did comply. If they didn't they would have had to face a disciplinary and ultimately get the sack.Blazeawaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-15264494999321729172012-06-14T17:38:37.892+01:002012-06-14T17:38:37.892+01:00And this sort of thing is why I don't vote Tor...And this sort of thing is why I don't vote Tory any more.<br /><br />I don't suppose EuroDave reads Dick's blog, but it might do him and his party a world of good if he did.Sam Duncannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-53805096187457845042012-06-14T13:51:56.200+01:002012-06-14T13:51:56.200+01:00I'mI'mGary Raineyhttp://www.facebook.com/gary.rainey.12noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-40259603972619873712012-06-14T13:00:37.396+01:002012-06-14T13:00:37.396+01:00I should also point out that it some e-cig sites t...I should also point out that it some e-cig sites that not<br />only promote the Chapman Trick regarding cigarettes, but promote the worst<br />(inflammatory) versions of the Chapman Trick, e.g.,<br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />http://ecigarettesbuy.com/category/tobacco-cigarettes-vs-electronic-cigarettes/<br /><br /><br />http://vapor-smoking.net/vapor-smoking-vs-real-cigarettes/<br /><br /><br />http://thesmartsmokers.com/articles.html<br /><br /><br />http://reviewecigs.com/<br /><br /><br />http://www.nuvapor.com/<br /><br /><br />http://www.themarketfinancial.com/electronic-cigarette-wholesaler-empowered-after-u-s-judge-decision-against-fda/1417<br /><br /><br /> Mag01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-17241761108791489952012-06-14T12:47:10.110+01:002012-06-14T12:47:10.110+01:00I would refer you to the comments at the link belo...I would refer you to the comments at the link below for a description and<br />the intent of the “Chapman Trick”.<br /><br /><br />http://cfrankdavis.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/doctors-in-name-only/<br /><br /><br /> Mag01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-26279144553613809002012-06-14T12:30:35.613+01:002012-06-14T12:30:35.613+01:00and stage smoke.and stage smoke.JonathanBagleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-25354642863800768622012-06-14T12:25:53.470+01:002012-06-14T12:25:53.470+01:00You'd think the agencies claiming to safeguard...You'd think the agencies claiming to safeguard the public's "health" would have actually read the FDA report which actually shows that there was nothing in any of the ecigs tested that could harm anyone. But no! They don't want you to smoke on any campus but of course it's okay to force you onto the road to breathe in those deliciously fragrant car exhaust fumes eh?<br />Freaking moron the lot of them!<br />C.B.cigarbabehttp://twitter.com/cigarbabe2noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-5999385342621307152012-06-14T11:57:03.022+01:002012-06-14T11:57:03.022+01:00Whilst I was reading your blog - it popped into my...Whilst I was reading your blog - it popped into my head that clamping down on vaping by anti-tobacco because it "seems" like smoking would be equivalent to anti-alcohol clamping down on drinking glasses because using them "seems" like drinking! Or possibly banning swallowing? Or what about banning sales of Orange Juice? The imagination wanders.....Vapingpoint Lizhttp://www.facebook.com/vapingpointnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-72358397906118842372012-06-14T11:50:28.214+01:002012-06-14T11:50:28.214+01:00 And toothpaste! And toothpaste!Vapingpoint Lizhttp://www.facebook.com/vapingpointnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-57994478813918744502012-06-14T10:19:22.656+01:002012-06-14T10:19:22.656+01:00 Banzhaf is an idiot. Propylene glycol isn't i... Banzhaf is an idiot. Propylene glycol isn't in antifreeze. It's a thickening agent found in a lot of foods.Legironnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-80599418966776731002012-06-14T09:59:23.910+01:002012-06-14T09:59:23.910+01:00hey Fake-
There's too much ecig info to post i...hey Fake-<br />There's too much ecig info to post it all here. Come on over here: www.e-cigarette-forum.comdocmenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-46719188654029939262012-06-14T09:24:09.303+01:002012-06-14T09:24:09.303+01:00I may have asked this before, but reading your blo...I may have asked this before, but reading your blog made me think about getting some e-cigs for my dad.<br /><br />I don't smoke so have no idea what's what, he smokes rollies with liquorice paper, is there any cheap one you would recommend?Fakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-54036585335319528722012-06-14T05:18:41.611+01:002012-06-14T05:18:41.611+01:00 Quite. A law/rule is only as good as the publics ... Quite. A law/rule is only as good as the publics willingness to abide by it.<br />What would they actualy DO if twenty or thirty people lit up in the canteen, or in the office one morning? Call the police to have them removed? MAYBE once, but EVERY morning for ten, twenty, thirty weeks?Furor Teutonicusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-35758749914413395612012-06-14T03:00:35.852+01:002012-06-14T03:00:35.852+01:00Did people comply?Did people comply?Junicannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-60042987339385145102012-06-14T01:23:47.866+01:002012-06-14T01:23:47.866+01:00"It's just that the people who claim to c..."It's just that the people who claim to care about smoking and health will put off, financially or by scaremongery, many many of those who might otherwise choose a safer alternative.".............<br />Like they did in 1979 in the USA when Philip Morris were about to launch the 'safer cigarette', or the UK when we had cigarettes containinjg NSM (new smoking material) which mysteriously disappeared from the shelves after 6 months.tim.bonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-75380297690351845822012-06-14T00:19:21.491+01:002012-06-14T00:19:21.491+01:00DP,
They also do the “Chapman Trick” for e-c...DP,<br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />They also do the “Chapman Trick” for e-cigs.<br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />Banzhaf: <i>"As the FDA and others have noted,<br />electronic cigarettes pose a wide variety of potential dangers to users, and<br />perhaps also to those around them, <b>both of whom inhale a mixture of nicotine (a dangerous drug) and<br />propylene glycol (which is used in<br />antifreeze[)] </b>and may cause respiratory tract irritation”</i><br /><br /><br /><br />http://www.pr-inside.com/electronic-cigarette-seller-sued-r1452385.htm<br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /> Mag01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-6373537953184138802012-06-13T23:31:13.589+01:002012-06-13T23:31:13.589+01:00I used to work for Lancashire County Council and t...I used to work for Lancashire County Council and they introduced an extreme anti-smoking policy.<br />Staff were banned from smoking in working hours even if they were off the premises. Even if they were in their own cars travelling to a 'job'.<br />The ban also applied to councillors - disgraceful as they are the representatives of the people. Equally disgracefully, the councillors didn't object. They meekly accepted being told that they could not even smoke in their own cars!<br />The bureaucrats even tried to ban smoking by members of the public on the road outside County Hall. They were told by their own legal department that they had no right to do that as the road was a public highway. They would have to buy the road to be able to enforce a ban! They didn't buy the road - but they installed signs on the public highway telling people that they couldn't smoke on the road - in the open air! Purporting to have powers they did not have.<br />I suppose some local government employees have too much time on their hands...<br />Night school attenders - paying customers - were told they couldn't smoke anywhere on the college premises. Not even on the playing field. They had to leave the grounds altogether to go and stand on a main road.<br />Some smokers inquired about the use of e-cigs. They don't give off smoke etc etc.<br />The council said the same ban applied to them.<br />That always puzzled me. I suspect the 'Policy Unit' did not understand the issues and just reproduced the views of the tobacco-control industry.<br />The council is Conservative controlled! Is this the modern Conservative way? I give up on them.Blazeawaynoreply@blogger.com