tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post1702772293340673158..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: Who's Paying WHO?Dick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-34395584924588660702014-08-23T22:00:56.364+01:002014-08-23T22:00:56.364+01:00The Gates Foundation is mostly providing vaccines ...The Gates Foundation is mostly providing vaccines and birth control without requiring the associated clinics to withhold family planning, to make up for the U.S. Government's policy of witholding vaccines from clinics that fully support women's health. CTFK, however, is a fully-controlled grandchild of Johnson & Johnson.Karyylnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-70044382862154898672014-08-23T21:58:22.177+01:002014-08-23T21:58:22.177+01:00The swine flu might not have had a super-high mort...The swine flu might not have had a super-high mortality rate, but those that died were the young and the pregnant, those with normally-high immune systems. Dying from having GOOD immunity is a hallmark of something to be afraid of, in the medical world -- it recalls the Spanish Influenza of 1917. I stood in line from 2am to 7am for my pregnant daughter and I am not at all sorry -- there were child deaths and pregnant women who died within my state and adjoining states and Mexico, which also adjoins my state. WHO needs to stop trashing their own credibility, because one of these things WILL break out someday, that's just the way nature deals with overpopulation, and when it happens, we need to have someone we can BELIEVE. (WHO health workers have also died of Ebola, so they have good people whose sacrifices are being thrown in the toilet by their Tobacco group's corruption.)Karyylnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-19242793666037486692014-08-23T03:26:23.285+01:002014-08-23T03:26:23.285+01:00Incredible.Incredible.Junicannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-72725727701293319172014-08-23T03:15:56.727+01:002014-08-23T03:15:56.727+01:00I think that the budget is for all FCTC activities...I think that the budget is for all FCTC activities for the next year.Junicannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-25749230065861589702014-08-22T22:50:14.906+01:002014-08-22T22:50:14.906+01:00DP, these may be of interest:
http://keionline.or...DP, these may be of interest:<br /><br />http://keionline.org/node/1430<br /><br /> http://www.who.int/about/resources_planning/A65_29Add1-en.pdfWhat the....noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-64105292188728630032014-08-22T11:58:33.261+01:002014-08-22T11:58:33.261+01:00Wait, what... $17.9m.. for 176 'parties'. ...Wait, what... $17.9m.. for 176 'parties'. So that's a cool $100k per 'party'.<br /><br /><br />That should be my kind of party, for sure.. but these people are professional puritans.. how the fuck do people like that spend $100k on a party? Just how many fat-free quinoa salads do they need?<br /><br /><br />Sure, I'm interested in where the money is coming from.. but not as much as I am in where it's going.The Thought Ganghttp://www.thethoughtgang.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-87286370546990112382014-08-22T00:10:51.266+01:002014-08-22T00:10:51.266+01:00In the past decade the WHO, in order to boost fund...In the past decade the WHO, in order to boost funds at<br /> its disposal entered into what it calls "public private partnerships."<br /> Instead of receiving its funds solely from member United Nations governments<br /> as its original purpose had been, WHO today receives almost double its<br /> normal UN budget in the form of grants and financial support from private<br /> industry. The industry? The very drug and vaccine makers who benefit from<br /> decisions like the June 2009 H1N1 Pandemic emergency declaration. As the<br /> main financiers of the WHO bureaucracy, naturally the Pharma Mafia and<br /> their friends receive what has been called "open door red carpet treatment"<br /> in Geneva.<br /> <br /> In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany,<br /> epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization<br /> of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the<br /> implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:<br /> <br /> "one of the extraordinary features of this influenza<br /> -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make<br /> predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them<br /> so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions.<br /> For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill<br /> us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making<br /> their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole<br /> industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.<br /> <br /> SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization<br /> (WHO)?<br /> <br /> Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists<br /> and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the<br /> impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence,<br /> and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these<br /> influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...<br /> <br /> When asked if the WHO had deliberately declared the Pandemic<br /> Emergency in order to create a huge market for H1N1 vaccines and drugs,<br /> Jefferson replied,<br /> <br /> "Don't you think there's something noteworthy about<br /> the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic? The old definition<br /> was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn't have immunity,<br /> and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two<br /> have been dropped, and that's how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic."<br /> <br /> Conveniently enough, the WHO published the new Pandemic<br /> definition in April 2009 just in time to allow WHO, on advice of SAGE and<br /> others like Albert "Dr Flu" Osterhaus and David Salisbury, to<br /> declare the mild cases of flu dubbed H1N1 Influenza A to be declared Pandemic<br /> Emergency.<br /> <br /> That's just an example, but it's not the one I'm looking forDragonmumnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-38698375109814054982014-08-21T21:23:18.027+01:002014-08-21T21:23:18.027+01:00Please do find what youre looking for, so the miss...Please do find what youre looking for, so the missed can be unmissed..Thomas Haugennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-70424521083708068812014-08-21T19:38:22.272+01:002014-08-21T19:38:22.272+01:00Pharma funding of the WHO is on record somewhere, ...Pharma funding of the WHO is on record somewhere, because I've seen and quoted it many times - for the life of me I can't remember where it is, so back to my bookmarks! Shall I start with "Scandal at the WHO"?Dragonmumnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-74143261421579736992014-08-21T19:38:21.264+01:002014-08-21T19:38:21.264+01:00The UK government should never have signed the FCT...The UK government should never have signed the FCTC. It is surrender of power to an unelected, unaccountable organisation that lacks credibility and by its own admission is corrupt. Millions of people die from TB, which can be prevented by a cheap vaccine whilst the WHO spends a fortune on a social engineering project that history tells us will fail.Ivan_Denisovichnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-68296603907008596722014-08-21T19:05:41.694+01:002014-08-21T19:05:41.694+01:00It's interesting that this particular demonisa...It's interesting that this particular demonisation of e-cigs can safely be dismissed as coming from the likes of BAT. The FCTC won't even let them watch, let alone take any cash from them. Without that blurring of blame (which I'm sure tobacco control are quite happy about), the real culprits are less difficult to spot.Dick_Puddlecotenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-87348419455414637472014-08-21T19:03:12.700+01:002014-08-21T19:03:12.700+01:00Now that's an interesting theory! ;)Now <i>that's</i> an interesting theory! ;)Dick_Puddlecotenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-75483284282560743332014-08-21T18:55:27.815+01:002014-08-21T18:55:27.815+01:00Well, it's quite obvious where the funding for...Well, it's quite obvious where the funding for their "local" representations come from. Everywhere they have firmly nisted themselves in "Centers for Cancer Research", And spread their metastases to other "heath" organisations. And they all are funded by the government (aka taxes) and a lot of gracious donations from the purely altruistic pharmafia ...Zillatronhttp://www.efvi.eu/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-10004147517911933592014-08-21T18:31:55.073+01:002014-08-21T18:31:55.073+01:00Seems fairly obvious that about half of the tobacc...Seems fairly obvious that about half of the tobacco control funds come from pharma, the main commercial beneficiary. The WHO's denial / obfuscation makes that seem even more likely. On the other hand perhaps it came from BAT :)Chris Pricenoreply@blogger.com