tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post8810121768510259212..comments2024-01-01T16:01:35.711+00:00Comments on Dick Puddlecote: Priorities Well And Truly ScrewedDick Puddlecotehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-43696444581747918572010-01-28T12:37:21.937+00:002010-01-28T12:37:21.937+00:00The problem is that the longer the lie that SHS is...The problem is that the longer the lie that SHS is harmful is out there unchallenged, the more it seeps into the collective psyche as a given (Christ, even Simon Clark of Forest recently said in an interview that he would urge caution in smoking around children).<br /><br />JayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-10820591523812998252010-01-28T10:51:38.391+00:002010-01-28T10:51:38.391+00:00Fantastic post, Dick. Beautifully written with som...Fantastic post, Dick. Beautifully written with some passionate arguments. It's when you read about gauleiters like this that you realise how far our country has slipped; I used to think that we would never adopt Fascism because it was alien to the British character, but how wrong I was. These bastards are everywhere, and I fear that we are getting towards the tipping point, after which a revolution will be necessary. Having said that, the revolution will be over in a flash, as none of these bastards could organise the proverbial, and their collective raison d'etre is to stand commonsense on its head so they'll be a pushover.Private Widdlenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-79165642450395682582010-01-28T04:14:54.538+00:002010-01-28T04:14:54.538+00:00Further proof, it were needed, that lefties care n...Further proof, it were needed, that lefties care not a whit for the disadvantaged, but for the opportunities that managing the disadvantaged provides.<br /><br />In my experience, children are not house plants and can give a perfectly reasonable answer to the question, "Would you like to live in this Utopian children's home or with these nasty, smelly smokers?"Roue le Jourhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09099318677226041054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-6000693153163602512010-01-28T03:35:01.477+00:002010-01-28T03:35:01.477+00:00People keep complicating things. Mark Wadsworth su...People keep complicating things. Mark Wadsworth suggests that smoking in children's bedrooms is 'not a good thing'. Mark, God bless him, has fallen into the trap, hasn't he? He has agreed and accepted that SHS is harmful to children. <br /><br />The whole point of smokers' understanding is that SHS is not harmful to anyone, including children. In fact, exposure to SHS could be beneficial to children in that it improves, or activates, their immune system. Obviously, there are reasonable limits - any person, child or adult, locked in a sealed room, pumped full of cigarette smoke, is going to suffer. But any person locked in a sealed room is going to exhaust the oxygen supply anyway.<br /><br />It is not to our advantage to accept that, UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, SHS is harmful to anyone, adult or child. <br /><br />In other words, the critically important thing for us who know the truth is to fight against the SCIENCE of SHS.<br /><br />The only way in which adoption agencies can be persuaded to ignore smoking preferences is if it can be shown that smoking is irrelevant as regards the wellbeing of children. That there are other things more important (can you see that, I myself, have fallen into the trap, just a little? By saying that there are other things that are more important, I have, in effect, implied that SHS has some importance!).<br /><br />But even if it was conclusively proved that SHS was harmless, there would still be those organizations who refuse to accept the proof. Such organizations have SYSTEMIC processes which rely upon the perceived truth, right or wrong. They are physically incapable of change. <br /><br />The best thing that we can do is to keep on fighting against the perception that SHS is harmful. <br /><br />Even when it has been proved beyond doubt that SHS is harmless. only DESPERATION will alter the status quo. If the government finds that it has hundreds of thousands of kids to look after and there are not sufficient non-smokers to look after them, then the government will very rapidly change its mind.<br /><br />Do you think that, in Haiti, at this time, anyone gives a toss about whether or not people who are looking after orphans smoke or not? QED.Junicannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-32345363867063716522010-01-28T01:13:08.644+00:002010-01-28T01:13:08.644+00:00I genuinely don't believe that smoking in the ...I genuinely don't believe that smoking in the same house as where children are does them any harm. Smoking in their bedroom, that is not good, but downstairs in the kitchen or sitting room, what's the problem?Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-58361452341941359082010-01-27T22:53:24.494+00:002010-01-27T22:53:24.494+00:00Me and me old dear fostered for fucking years and ...Me and me old dear fostered for fucking years and both of us smoke yet every single child we had from a kiddies home was far more sexualized than was healthy. The pompous fucking cunts.Dick the Prickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02683095612320513712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3141759542968821728.post-85953949139542991472010-01-27T22:04:43.885+00:002010-01-27T22:04:43.885+00:00Is it not distastfull that the only social groups ...Is it not distastfull that the only social groups that can be derided are smokers and hetrosexual males.<br />However smokers can be persecuted as well as derided.<br />I noticed the lefty hack from the "gaurdian" ,guardian of propaganda I think, admonished the habit of small amounts of alchohol as being OK .<br />Well ,ive got some bad news for you sonny,<br />The antis agenda is this.<br />After they ban fags they will be out of a job,they are lining up alchohol as their next money spinner .<br />Ooops bit of an own goal there ?<br />How will journalists survive then ,eh ?<br />Home brew ain't as good ,is it ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com