"Public health has been transformed into a medically induced assault on the health of society"
Lots of people like drugs, try asking them about it
In advance of the inevitable Christmas nanny avalanche, Turkey fat is good fat
Antartic ice sheet scaremongers appear to have ignored key elements of physics
Seven ways the Mafia made the US a better place
Irish Cancer Society figures show non-smokers are nearly twice as likely to die as smokers are
One letter difference, yet two countries' respective banking policies result in opposite outcomes
Punk isn't dead as Lydon prompts Jamiroquai to call for airline farting bans
New Zealand's experience proves that decriminalisation of prostitution doesn't lead to a 'free for all'
Monty Python's 'Hell's Grannies' become reality
Shifting the consensus on civil liberties
'Buy a tramp a can of Stella' this Christmas, it's what the little baby Jesus would want
4 comments:
just read the Klein article and did a fair bit of self re-education on wiki into epicureanism and related philosophy. after removing my ignorance i discovered epicureanism is an amazing philosophy based on the non-agression principle and the idea of mutually beneficial behaviour and, ultimately, the pursuit of happiness.
no small wonder then that all the critical comments on the Klein article repeatedly mentioned things like the "social cost," "effects on society," and "socio-economic problems." im sure noone around here would be surprised to find that socialists dont like individualism or happiness.
Yep, it's the comments which pushed it to top choice. :)
Yes - interesting those stats on smokers dying in Ireland - hard really to know where to start there are so many errors.
1. The quote from the CSO that the biggest cause of death is 'old age'. There is no such thing as dying of old age. Old age is not a disease. What are these people dying from? Heart failure? Chest infection? A TIA ? - It matters because the cause of death may have been exacerbated by a factor such as smoking.
2. The person making these calculations is making school boy errors in their arithmetic. If 6000 smokers die each year there are no stats saying they all died from smoking related diseases. They may have been knocked down by a car. So you can’t say that a mortality rate of 21% is ascribable to any single cause. Until you break down the causes of the smokers deaths the mortality rate statistic is meaningless.
3. moreover neither can you say that as 31% of the Irish population smoke that means an Irish smoker has a greater chance of surviving than a non smoker (as smoker supposedly only has a 21% chance of dying) . You are arbitrarily dividing the country into two groups – smokers and non smokers. But again as someone can die of anything (the 69% non smokers will includes infant mortalities too - ) the two figures (smokers and non smokers ) are not equivalents. Therefore the statistic is invalid
4 the last paragraph is even worse. It builds on the first two errors and comes up with an utterly ludicrous figure for p (probability of dying).
If you want to prove black is white, you can turn water into wine and cigarettes don’t cause disease – you just carry on there – but you are going to have to do a lot better than this garbage
Wasn't "Hell's Grannies" the Goodies rather than Monty Python?
Post a Comment