Friday 14 February 2014

'Raping Lungs' And 'Cancer Semen'

A few years ago, we set up a catalogue of psychopathic comments from online smoking articles. Some submissions were magnificent insights into the minds of the mentally unbalanced - see here.

However, many months have passed - last time was July 2011, in fact - since we've seen an article-length example of pure, spittle-flecked anti-smoker insanity.

The wait is over, folks.
To protect those who don’t smoke, enclosed public spaces have been deemed totally smoke-free by many authorities around the world. 
Yet some people choose to violate those laws, lighting up and blowing their smoke around, as if nothing happened. 
When they do, they are raping non-smokers’ lungs. They are taking something from inside their bodies and forcing it inside someone else’s, just because they feel like it. 
They inseminate other people’s lungs with cancer-causing chemicals. 
They impregnate them with tumors. 
So here we are. Talking rape. Not your average fuck-you-and-cum-inside-you rape, but the light-up-and-make-you-breathe-in-and-swallow stuff. 
Rape has evidently evolved. Smokers that choose to smoke in smoke-free areas are practicing it without being called out for it. They are getting away with it. 
Venue owners who allow it are enabling it. 
Police who turn a blind eye to it are enabling it. 
People who say nothing about it are allowing themselves to be fucked in the lungs. 
Am I exaggerating?
Yeah, just a tad, sunshine. Just a tad. Now go see nurse as she has some Ritalin for you.

Good grief.

H/T James Dunworth via FB


18 comments:

Lorien said...

I really take exception at the misusing of the term rape. It's repulsive. I want to be all eloquent and flowery with my language but frankly, I am so fucking disgusted at what I have just read that all I have is, cunts!

Sorry.

Séan Billings said...

I wonder what victims of ACTUAL rape would make of this zealot trivialising their experience like that. Someone should point a rape survivor support organisation or two at this article.

RooBeeDoo said...

'If smoking in the presence of non-smokers is not the same as raping their lungs, why don’t smokers smoke in the presence of their children? Of their friends’ children?

'Why don’t they smoke in the presence of children in general?'
WHAT?!?
Should I call the police - I think my eyes have just been raped.

Jo Lincoln said...

My blood is officially boiling.

Ripper said...

Anyone who will find rape in such a distant, non related subject is likely to be one who would commit the crime. Those zealot comments are one big Freudian slip.

Mac McCubbin said...

No, no, no! It's second-hand rape, have you learned nothing?

harleyrider1778 said...

I had hit it already but ehh! He deserved this one:

The anti-smoking nazis PSYCHOSIS has been studied and found non-harmful and they can seek treatment!

Toxicol Rev. 2003;22(4):235-46.

Idiopathic environmental intolerance: Part 1: A causation analysis applying Bradford Hill's criteria to the toxicogenic theory.

Staudenmayer H, Binkley KE, Leznoff A, Phillips S.

Source

Behavioral Medicine, Multi-Disciplinary Toxicology, Treatment and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80222, USA. hstaudenmayer@comcast.net

Abstract

Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI) is a descriptor for a phenomenon that has many names including environmental illness, multiple chemical sensitivity and chemical intolerance. Toxicogenic and psychogenic theories have been proposed to explain IEI. This paper presents a causality analysis of the toxicogenic theory using Bradford Hill's nine criteria (strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, biological plausibility, coherence, experimental intervention and analogy) and an additional criteria (reversibility) and reviews critically the scientific literature on the topic. The results of this analysis indicate that the toxicogenic theory fails all of these criteria. There is no convincing evidence to support the fundamental postulate that IEI has a toxic aetiology; the hypothesised biological processes and mechanisms are implausible.
...

Dick_Puddlecote said...

Of course. To the head teacher's office for me!

harleyrider1778 said...

Its highly unlikely a rape victim would want an after sex smoke with that POS.

harleyrider1778 said...

Poor sharks they deserve better dinner dates

harleyrider1778 said...

Im kinda kinky myself,im into the train system with the 3rd hand rape stuff!

truckerlyn said...

It might be a little off topic, but I was listening to Jeremy Vine today whilst he was discussing climate change. He had this idiot on who was going on about how the climate has never changed in the past, so it must be down to us. (Sorry I can't remember the whole bit). The bit that really got me was that, apparently, we ALL know that cigarettes WILL give you cancer, you just cannot pinpoint which actual cigarette it was that gave it to you!


With idiots like that dealing with climate change, God help us, NOW, please!

Ripper said...

This guy is getting torn to pieces in the comments.. verbally gang raped, even..

http://urbantimes.co/2014/02/lets-talk-about-rape-and-smoking/

Line crosser said...

The end game is nigh with the anti smoking psychos
Enough is enough
Time is ripe for the search for a few hundred nutters to bring the matter to the boil,an urgent requirement to get to grip with the ring leaders of the paranoic circus......Lets call their bluff, lets see what they are made of, time to find out if they have the guts to merit their convictions (and financial rewards),to face the ones they treat as undesirables. let all see what they really are .
I suspect these pretenders are as yellow livered as the ones they deride and ridicule, the pathetic rainsodden smokers who stand whimpering in ten thousand pub doorways as well as the chickenlivered publicans who cant muster a bleat between them.
Et Tu ?

Dragonmum said...

A few screws rattling around loose in that particular attic; I suppose I should feel some pity for anyone as mentally unhinged as that, but given the context he's dared to use - I don't, I really don't. He should be shut away with his hatreds where he can do no more harm.

MarkWadsworth said...

Awesome, are you absolutely sure it wasn't satire?

Dick_Puddlecote said...

Certain of it. The place looks to be a lefty talking shop, batting around ideas for the purpose of.

theprog said...

I agree. The irony is that 'freedom fighters/truth seekers' such as this piece of shit actually believe the SHS crap, naively unaware that the real reason behind smoking bans has nothing do to with the health of non-smokers.