Sunday, 20 September 2009

Vintage Righteous


There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth in the Daily Mail comments section on Friday about this.

Parents who give their child the occasional glass of wine with their meal could be turning them into binge drinkers, scientists have warned.

Growing numbers of middle class parents are following the example of French families and allowing their offspring to drink wine with their meals, in the belief it will teach them to drink responsibly.

But now a study has found children who are introduced to alcohol by their parents are more likely to grow into problem drinkers later in life.

Can't say I was too surprised. It's just another step along the hearts and flowers and pretty butterflies adorned avenue of alcohol denormalisation.

It is led by the World Health Organisation, who in their ultimate self-delared wisdom, judged a long time ago that alcohol is intrinsically evil and must be beaten with a big pointy stick. They produce 'Framework' policies on a number of things they don't like, and their stated aim with regard to alcohol and children [pdf] is.

All children and adolescents have the right to grow up in an environment protected from the negative consequences of alcohol consumption and, to the extent possible, from the promotion of alcoholic beverages.

Very laudable, except that there are no grey areas in their view of life. Merely black and white - alcohol bad, temperance good. Quality of parenting is not taken into account, neither are any other considerations.

Keeping children alcohol free and delaying the onset of drinking are safer.

The WHO dole out billions in research grants, and if you come up with the correct results, you are very likely to be given another gig. This particular study was performed by Washington University in Missuori. On US subjects? Not on your nelly. For some reason they chose twins from Australia. Sniffy? I should coco.

And if someone - I dunno, maybe a tedious saggy-arsed prodnose, for example - wants a job with the WHO ...

If, as seems likely, [Liam Donaldson] is moved out of Richmond House next year, a plum job awaits him at the World Health Organisation. In which case it would be a fitting ending for a man who thinks in terms of populations. The most far-reaching of public servants would at last get to serve the most far-reaching of publics.

... what should he be advocating?

Children under the age of 15 should not be allowed to drink alcohol under new official guidelines that will even rule out a a glass of wine at dinner with parents. The controversial advice, expected from the Chief Medical Officer, Liam Donaldson, today, is set to spark fierce debate on the best way to encourage sensible drinking.

It's all rather predictable, isn't it?

And don't think that with Donaldson out of the picture, post-GE 2010, that this will just be quietly dropped. The Tories have James Brokenshire, a pliant berk who is already making noises of which the WHO would be most appreciative.

Not very long till five is changed to fifteen in this advice on the government's web-site, methinks.

Under five years old

It is illegal to give an alcoholic drink to a child under five except under medical supervision in an emergency.

The Mail readership pointing out that French kids are routinely exposed to the nation's viniculture at an early age, with negligible negative effects, is immaterial. The WHO don't want Britain aping France and being mature about alcohol. They will instead, eventually, pressure France to fall into line once other nations have been browbeaten into righteous compliance.

As a footnote. Guess how many people worldwide voted for the apppointment of World Health Organisation policy-makers. Go on, have a stab.




5 comments:

Gigits said...

Well, they are finished with smoking, apart from a few foxholes that need to be dealt with, booze is next on their agenda.

I'm a moderate drinker and a fairly heavy smoker. I do worry that my 'vices' will soon be so frowned upon that I will only be able to engage in them in the privacy of my own home, with the curtains drawn of course.

I think that people are genetically programmed to be heavy drinkers and no amount of hand wringing about kids drinking is going to change that.

Anonymous said...

Re footnote - my guess is zero (there's no prize, is there - it's too easy?)

Jay

Man with Many Chins said...

I think exposing kids to alcohol in a structured family environment as part of the meal is a GOOD thing. It teaches them to enjoy alcohol responsibly.

Fucking puritan authoritarian shit stabbing cunts. Why dont they just fuck off and fucking die in a festering puss ridden heap.

BTS said...

There was an article in New Scientist a couple of years ago in which they claimed to have found a genetic link to alcoholism. It would most likely be a genetic predisposition towards addiction generally I'd have thought but as alcohol is legal it's easier to study.

And coming from a long line of alcoholics I'd say that it seems to hold good. Fortunately I'm a firm believer in tradition..

Andy Davis said...

Dick
Do the Temperance movement not like this latest stat: http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/news.ma/article/84449?N=598325&Ne=598327&PagingData=Po_0~Ps_10~Psd_Asc
So consumption down over the past 10 years, and drink related convictions 75% fewer than 30 years ago, yet we have a Drink epidemic, and need to ban advertising and 'exposing children' to its evils?
Perhaps we are all too pissed to notice all the anti-social behaviour - just ask Ian Gilmour.